UK and Global MPLS Providers Background.jpg
The Network Union, our Flagship content.

The 2017 UK or Global MPLS Providers IT Managers Buyers Resource Pack. Rated as Excellent.

FOR BUYERS OF UK OR GLOBAL MPLS PROVIDERS NETWORK CONNECTIVITY
The Network Union write for Techtarget.com and are recognised for our Global and UK WAN procurement expertise.

Your Go-To WAN Buyers Pack Report for Procurement of UK or Global MPLS Providers.

  • Our list of lesser known providers (outside of the usual huge suspects listed below)
  • WAN RFP and requirements document in Word or Pages format
  • A step-by-step Mindmap detailing every key buying area we know to be important
  • The Art of WAN Procurement free workshop held at your office and hosted by techtarget.com and WAN procurement expert Robert Sturt (Hint, rated as excellent by Permira, British Legion and others)


An essential free set of resource created by Techtarget.com writer and WAN procurement expert, Robert Sturt.

Includes over 15 years of research into the key areas you must consider when buying WAN, cloud and security. Presented as a single page stunning Mindmap.

We haven’t stopped there. We’ve also included our RFP template with an additional WAN requirements document (you can edit them both in Word format) and our list of the lesser known UK or Global MPLS providers. (We all know the usual large telco’s, our list is based on providers we’ve actually used in our practice)

Version 3 of the WAN buyers Mindmap includes a glimpse into future trends, i.e. MPLS vs VPLS vs SD-WAN and how security and cloud must factor in to procurement decisions.

RESOURCE: THE IT MANAGERS WAN PROCUREMENT SURVIVORS PACK

(We never share data and only send you emails about new WAN procurement content, it’s really simple to opt out).

The free IT Managers WAN Buyers Pack

Is there a list of the usual Global and UK MPLS Providers?

  • BT Global Services
  • BT Business
  • Orange Business Services
  • Level3
  • AT&T
  • Interoute
  • Verizon
  • Vodafone
  • COLT



Is it odd for a BT Partner to create such a list?

First and foremost we're educators. That's our goal. Our intent is to help which, in theory, should result in trust and engagement. 

Permira, CDC, British Legion and others ALL started their WAN procurement journey via one of our free workshops. Learn about SD-WAN, MPLS vs VPLS, QoS, App Performance, Diversity and more. All available in the comfort of your own office - just provide us with a whitboard and pen. Over and above the list, in this article, we'll discuss some of the main areas to consider when researching the market.  

Global and UK MPLS Providers.png


HOW MANY IT MANAGERS ARE ABLE TO LIST MORE THAN THREE OF THE USUAL GLOBAL OR UK MPLS PROVIDER SUSPECTS?

It’s a common problem. But it’s not insurmountable, some of the most innovative providers are lesser known yet manage services for some of the most recognisable businesses with hundreds of sites down to smaller three site networks. There really is something for everyone.

The challenge is twofold; 

  • Obtain a list of the best / top recommended UK or Global MPLS WAN providers.
  • Gauge their capability by aligning the specifics of your requirements with the market-place.



Most IT teams will list the usual large telco’s, perhaps BT Global Services, AT&T, Verizon and so forth. However, there are some providers offering services from MPLS and VPLS through to SD-WAN. Some are not providers; they offer a unique channel approach operating within partner channels. (Essentially how we operate)

GOT A PROJECT? LET'S TALK.

OR VISIT OUR MPLS PROVIDER PRODUCT PAGE

MOVING FROM ONE INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPLIER TO ANOTHER CREATES CHALLENGES 

The migration of an MPLS network is the biggest reason cited for lack of change across Global and UK Enterprise businesses.

Below: Our Mindmap (grab a copy when you request the list) showing all of the key areas IT teams must consider.

The MPLS Providers Mindmap TNU.jpg

The dual running of networks, user disruption, VPN presales documentation, tail circuit issues, bandwidth throughput, test planning, security and so on.

Without careful thought and planning, managing migration could turn into a real business impacting issue. However, organisations are in a position to minimise these problems by gaining an understanding of the risks, pitfalls and opportunities.

Many of the issues which occur are not the result of the actual migration work; they revolve around UK and Global MPLS providers poorly managing and planning the process. Negative management coupled with a basic understanding of where the risks often exist severely impact businesses.

However, there are project managers we work with today who consistently succeed. Do they iron out every single issue? No, but they minimise and forewarn of problems as they occur and manage to steer the company around them.

But. Even with the best and most experienced Enterprise VPLS or MPLS VPN project manager could be potentially doomed to failure with poorly defined business requirements and unrealistic global or UK delivery dates.

A quick health check starts with the following example questions:

  • Are your organisation's objectives clear and are you able to measure them?
  • Do you currently have service documentation regarding project deliverables, timescales and required resources?A quick health check starts with the following example questions
  • At first glance, do the UK or Global MPLS providers deliverables look realistic next to the timescales?
  • If work has already been started on your project, is there an audit trail?
  • Is everyone within your business aligned with the end goal and do they understand what they expect to achieve?

Project planning for global and UK MPLS providers procurement is a critical component of any implementation (unless you are talking about only a couple of sites). The need to clarify objectives is necessary to ensure everybody involved in the project is fully onboard with the requirements. If goals appear hazy, then your project may well descend into a commodity based buying decision.

Also, and this is a real point of clarity, IT management need to distinguish between an objective and a requirement. The two are very different with ‘requirements’ being more accurate regarding the expected outcome. Pinning down the scope helps here since this describes the boundary to be drawn around what the project will and will not deliver.

The value proposition is discussed as a ‘throw away’ term whenever we’ve experienced the typical sales meeting over the years. “We provide tremendous value” is spoken about as if it’s the gospel of UK account managers worldwide. The percentage of businesses which succeed in obtaining this kind of value is pretty small, especially in the sales arena.

We believe clarity is required because it is so difficult to quantify value. Within the UK / Global MPLS providers marketplace, this requires a repeatable process which will surround the following core service areas.

YOUR EXISTING SITUATION

The current situation is perhaps an overlooked element but discovering what is and isn’t working for your organisation is the best place to start. We suggest beginning with how the solution is managed, consider some of the ways in which you are supported. Armed with this data, we recommend creating a statement of requirements based on the issues and problems or opportunities you uncover. Let’s talk about some of the crucial areas now.

MPLS VPN TOPOLOGY AND USER DATA FLOWS

The cloud, mobile and globalisation are changing the way in which typical global and UK topology is designed. When looking at your existing solution, consider how traffic flows from users through to applications.

  • What are the potential risks associated with application downtime within the current circuits?
  • What are the restrictions surrounding the existing VPN flow regarding points of failure with failover?
     

An important aspect of application flow is the performance of IP applications from the host through to the application and, of course, the return trip. Understanding this monitoring and reporting data may require training or you may not have access to legacy trends due to your statistics capability (or lack of it). Statistics and trends are not just about latency and jitter; they are also about the performance regarding fix times — I.e. How the MPLS providers support department actions and processes tickets and issues through to completion.

We often perceive any reports and analysis as purely technical documents, but I would advise writing about how the supplier communicates in general via the existing WAN. Other favourable trends to understand are growth both regarding user quantity but how the users are accessing resources.

  • Is there a noticeable trend towards home working or collaboration?
  • How are the users and their applications are adding value to the organisation?

This analysis will support your recommendations when considering any new Global or UK MPLS network proposals. Diagnosing your existing situation is an essential component of our mindmap and will ultimately ensure you minimise the typical problems we see in the UK and global marketplace.

The technical aspects of the MPLS WAN surround, in the main, applications. The core subject of apps is how the connectivity performs between the user and application.

MPLS NETWORK DESIGN AND APPLICATION TYPE 

Quality of Service (QoS) Expedited Forwarding, Assured Forwarding and Best Effort

Understanding the properties of VPN applications is a critical component of WAN procurement. The majority of apps fall into policy categories which align well to the typical IP QoS (Quality of Service) settings offered by telcos and carriers. Gaining clarity on your application types and flows will allow your organisation to understand how each packet should be treated across an MPLS providers core.

Delay Sensitive

Voice and Video packets are typical delay sensitive applications and require strict priority end to end. Any delay outside of performance parameters will result in frustrating conversations. When considering a network, a focus is needed on end to end latency and performance to ensure your business is armed with the best possible user experience.

Beyond voice and video, other critical applications include, as an example, Citrix. Although Citrix will stand a little delay and jitter, a consistent packet performance will be required to avoid user frustration.

When considering the technical design of applications, the flow between user and server should be documented.

Application Latency and Jitter performance

The performance of your networking applications is governed by the Uk or Global MPLS providers packet latency and in the case of VoIP (Voice over IP), jitter performance. When considering the SLA’s provided by WAN infrastructure connectivity, we need be mindful that the figures will almost certainly only cover core performance. When deploying global networks, IT Management should be aware that the tail circuit (distance between your site and the provider edge) will have an impact on latency.

In some instances, NNI (Interconnects between networks) will be used where the services do not have a local presence. In the case of NNI connections, the latency and jitter SLA may well not be known and, therefore, your organisation's expectations should be set accordingly. The bandwidth is becoming less of an issue with 100Mbps and 1Gbps Ethernet circuits being provisioned as standard.

MPLS Network Diagram above shows dual Cisco routers, dual local Exchange termination points with dual Provider Edge nodes. If circuit A fails, traffic is automatically re-routed over to the second circuit.

Our list demonstrates there are some points to consider seriously. The entry point into your building is largely determined by the availability of dual access points. In some instances, dual MPLS network access is simply not possible due to listed status resulting in no structural work being allowed. If dual points are provided, the circuits will typically route via either end of a building.

Resilient CPE, using Cisco routers as an example, involves two routers running HSRP (Hot Standby Routing Protocol). The configuration is quite simple if one route fails, the other takes responsibility for the data.

The most common placed misconception is that using two providers is the best way to achieve network diversity — this is not the case. When implementing dual circuits, consider that neither company has access to their respective circuit network plans. This means that Ethernet tail circuits will often follow the same route out of the building which will result in an outage if a fibre chop occurs. In fact, the only way to achieve dual supplier resiliency is to create geographical separation if your business is intent on using dual suppliers.

Tail circuits should always be ordered as a diverse official product. With the UK or global BT MPLS, their product is called either Secure Access or RA02 (Resilient Access). Other service providers will clearly have their branding for diversity products.

Dual local exchanges are largely down to wholesale supplier infrastructure availability and are often not known until site survey occurs. When a diverse order is placed, the MPLS connectivity provider will attempt to create as much separation as possible. If a single exchange is delivered, different equipment will be used to minimise the risk of an outage and traffic downtime.

With geographical diversity, a point to point link will be required between sites. The latency must be low to support the keep-alive packets created by HSRP. However, when to offices are located in different locations, the tail circuit routing to the provider will clearly be different. Fortunately, low latency point to point Ethernet connectivity is widely available.

Dual Provider Edge MPLS Network architecture availability is largely dependent on scale. The critical question to ask any MPLS VPN service provider concerns their solutions True Edge scale. In some instances, marketing may state that a particular telco or carrier has 98% coverage and yet, when you focus in on the detail, the statement reflects wholesale access and not true edge coverage.

On the subject of MPLS BGP Routing and Internet, considering using dual providers for MPLS network services is a daunting task. The Internet works differently to private based networks.
Operating a multi-provider BGP solution is never an easy proposition.

MPLS IS ONE ELEMENTS OF THE CLOUD AND, AT THE SAME TIME, IS THE ENABLER TO CLOUD SERVICES SUCCESS

The cloud is the fix all solution to every IT problem, or so marketing would have you believe. As an example of where the cloud doesn’t necessarily provide a match for every solution, consider the mobile revolution which we are in the midst of right now. The result of this explosive mobile growth is creativity. Users creating content often need huge, fast local processing and storage together with the need to change a mixed collection of media.

Consider an online magazine where retouching of photo’s or video production may be required. The theory that everyone is positioned well to replace local processing and storage, using the cloud, is not strictly correct. With this said, the cloud does offer a global, highly resilient, on-demand, secure capability for the primary applications which do not require a local presence. The success of cloud performance will be reliant on the underlying WAN technologies & connectivity or local Internet connectivity.

Some applications should only be made available across the private based Global or UK MPLS IP VPN due to security and the requirement for a consistent, predictable delivery. The takeaway is to understand your specifics, applications, user set vs. local and cloud-based storage to begin the design process.

Always remember that although the cloud is marketed as a cost-effective method of outsourcing our IT requirements, delivery of application traffic is an additional charge. The necessary bandwidth together with good latency and jitter performance infrastructure performance is critical to cloud-based application performance.

UK VS. GLOBAL WAN PROCUREMENT

In the main, the difference between procurement across a national based company vs. International is as follows.
Global organisations are much more sensitive to latency. Typically, an SLA will cover the core network infrastructure from edge to edge and not the tail circuit. In this respect, the latency between (for example), the UK and the USA may well be within the necessary performance parameters according to the SLA. In reality, the additional delay created by the tail circuit could push the application over the edge of satisfactory traffic performance.


Multiple international tail circuit providers are harder to manage. Every country has their import restrictions, data privacy laws, regulation and so forth. Although your SP team should be aware, these elements will potentially create confusion and delay. 

LOOKING FOR TECHNICAL DATA ON MPLS

What follows is a number of definitions and links to help explain some of the Multi Protocol Label Switching protocol terminology.

  • Private MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching)
  • Packet Forwarding - A packet is used when describing a until of data at layer 3.
  • QoS control (Quality of Service) - Used to control PHB forwarding (Per hop behaviour). Other technology descriptions include DiffServ (Differentiated Services).
  • Quality of Service (QoS) has been detailed earlier on within this content. PHB (Per Hop Behaviour) is a component of QoS used to define the properties of IP Precedence. IP Precedence controls the priority of the data packets.
  • IP Routers - The traditional Cisco router was designed to perform one job, to forward packets from LAN (Local Area Networks). Today, routers from vendors such as Cisco offer greater functionality to from terminating remote users and small networks through to the very fabric of large scale data centre connectivity.
  • The CE (Customer Edge) is essentially the hardware which resides on your office site. No Multiprotocol label switching is performed at the CE level.
  • The PE LSR resides at the edge of the providers network and represents the first point of entry into a Multiprotocol label switched network. Labels are examined.
  • Routing Protocols - (Including OSPF, BGP, IGRP, EIGRP)
  • FEC (Forwarding Equivalence Class). A FEC is a class (Group) of packets which are forwarded using the same profile, across a path with the same treatment. A FEC may be configured to such parameters as destination IP address or a class which an LSR (Label Switched Router) is configured to treat with importance.
  • Switching is used in Local Area Networks allowing fast access to data. Switching at layer 2 is very efficient since there are no modifications to the data packet. A layer 2 switch is used to break up collision domains.
  • Traffic Shaping - Packets treated with (QoS - WRR, RED, WRED)
  • ISP - (Internet Service Provider). Offering services to the Internet.
  • VPNs - (Virtual Private Networks)
  • Frame Relay & ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode)
  • Security - A great article from Cisco on network security

Below. The MPLS Header. (Confusing? Don't worry, it's not too important in the context of networking procurement).

MPLS Network Fundementals

Get in contact if you required more information.